But more importantly… wouldn’t they?

5/5/10

Beyond nostalgia…

The last few days I have been doing further research on the results from the ballistics’ report in question and I wonder why no one ever did follow up on the discrepancy. In order for you to follow this train of thought, let’s go back to the beginning of this blogging process when I put forth some of what was included in the GBI report; in particularly the last portion of the report containing the responses about item (3) and item (6).

Let’s revisit: (information found at the tail end of GBI State Crime Lab report, reference Case # 76917)

“…
SERVICES REQUESTED: Firearms identification; check paraffin casts.

RESULTS: Item (1) the paraffin cast of the right hand is positive for nitrate.
Item (3) the bullet identified as being removed from the left side of the head shows the remains of three lands and grooves with left hand twist.
Test bullets fired from the .38 Special Colt Commando, Item (6), shows six lands, six grooves with left hand twist.
…”

If we review what is written by Ann L. Davis two blogs ago, then one would have to assume that the bullets were fired from two different guns… wouldn’t we?
But more importantly… wouldn’t they?

P.S. Item (4), the bullet removed from the frontal lobe area of the brain- the bullet fired through the chin is not even mentioned. Why?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: